![]() Responding to the news today of the record fine for Meta's GDPR violations, Nigel Jones, co-founder of the Privacy Compliance Hub, said: "Meta has prepared for the fine, but it is huge. Meta has also shed over 20,000 jobs since November 2022, as Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg pursues his “year of efficiency” for the firm. In January, it was revealed that Meta alone was required to pay over 80 per cent of all fines levied by the EU in 2022 for GDPR violations, with its bill running to over £500m. News of the record fine comes only days after it emerged that three-quarters of GDPR-related decisions made by the DPC in EU-wide cases since 2018 were subsequently overruled by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB), which felt that the Irish watchdog’s decisions were not sufficiently stringent.Ģ023 could be shaping up as something of an annus horribilis in financial terms for Meta. They added: “No country has done more than the US to align with European rules via their latest reforms, while transfers continue largely unchallenged to countries such as China.” If this is put in place before Meta’s deadline to stop using the current system there will be no disruption to Facebook, Sir Nick and Newstead said. Policymakers on both sides of the Atlantic are currently scrambling to find a new agreement on how data can be shared across borders. They also criticised the European Data Protection Board for overruling the DPC’s initial decision that a fine was unjustified because Meta had acted in good faith. “Without the ability to transfer data across borders, the internet risks being carved up into national and regional silos, restricting the global economy and leaving citizens in different countries unable to access many of the shared services we have come to rely on,” the statement from Sir Nick and Newstead added. They said there was not going to be any immediate disruption to Facebook and that Meta would appeal against the decision. We are therefore disappointed to have been singled out when using the same legal mechanism as thousands of other companies looking to provide services in Europe”. The US and EU rules are in “fundamental conflict”, the company said on Monday.Ī joint statement issued by Meta president of global affairs Sir Nick Clegg and chief legal officer Jennifer Newstead said: “It is a conflict that neither Meta nor any other business could resolve on its own. Meta said that the issue was larger than simply the practices of one company. The DPC originally refused, thinking that the complaint was not sustainable, but was overruled years later by the EU's Court of Justice. ![]() This sparked a request for the DPC to investigate how Facebook data was shared across continents. The Snowden revelations put a question mark over the whole system. The multi-year process which led to the fine was kicked off by Edward Snowden in 2013 when the National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower revealed that US authorities were surveilling systems run by several US companies.Ĭompanies had long been allowed to transfer EU customers’ data to the US to help them run their business, but only on a promise that they were protecting this data as well as if it was being stored in the EU. It ordered Meta Ireland to “suspend any future transfer of personal data to the US within the period of five months” and also levied a record fine on the business “to sanction the infringement that was found to have occurred”. The DPC said that Meta had breached part of the European GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) rules in the way that it had moved data of Facebook users across borders. The record fine was levied by Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC) after a three-year probe into the social media giant.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |